Troubleshooting – CMDC https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com Supporting the Masonry Design Community Mon, 25 Apr 2022 13:35:14 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/cropped-android-chrome-512x512-1-32x32.png Troubleshooting – CMDC https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com 32 32 Known Bugs in MASS https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/known-bugs-in-mass/ Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:10:17 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=6567 Bugs are found from time to time and in our effort to be trustworthy and transparent, they are posted here as well as appearing on the MASS Welcome Screen

The known bugs page was formerly hosted here and has since been moved to the MASS software documentation site:

Known Bugs in MASS

For questions about specific bugs, or to report a bug, contact mass@canadamasonrycentre.com

]]>
MASS Bug Notification: Software Crashes Unexpectedly https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/mass-bug-notification-software-crashes-unexpectedly/ Mon, 30 Mar 2020 18:22:15 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=7430 Ever had MASS stop working while working on a design? You aren’t alone!

In any windows architecture application, there is a limit of 10,000 GDI objects. Internally, there a number of these crated with every design and population of each results screen. Unfortunately, there are a number of these that are not properly “cleaned up” so using the same MASS window for an extended period of time will trigger this crash.

The release of MASS Version 4.0 has mitigated the problem but there are always residual GDI objects between every design. Our recommendation in dealing with this issue is to regularly save your work.

A full video demonstrating this and how to check your GDI object status is shown below:

This issue is most likely to occur when designing a shearline or multi-storey shear wall module as these assemblage options coordinate the creation of several shear wall elements internally, triggering the creation of additional GDI objects.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact MASS support.

As always, feel free to contact us if you have any questions at all. CMDC is the authorized service provider for the MASS software which is a joint effort of between CCMPA and CMDC.

]]>
MASS Website and Activation Server Outage – Updated https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/mass-website-and-activation-server-outage/ Tue, 14 May 2019 13:07:12 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=7304 Server migration issues have resulted in a (now restored) temporary outage for all MASS software renewals and license activations

Update for MASS Version 4.0 Release: Online Activation functionality has been restored.

Update (May 16th, 4:00PM EDT): The MASS website access has been restored.

Update (May 15th, 3:15PM EDT): Access to the MASS license service provider’s server has been restored and all activation support is back online. The software website is still not back online.

Earlier this week, CMDC received a notification from our hosting provider that the server used to host our software license web service has been decommissioned and everything migrated to a new server. CMDC was given no advanced warning that this migration would occur. While all information has been properly backed up and transferred intact, there are some additional network connections that must be completed before the MASS website and activation web service is back online.

As a result, the entire MASS website, where all purchases, license renewals, activations, and supplementary support material is offline while this gets sorted out. All links to the web service through our database software are also offline until IT support is able to restore the connection. As a result, all activations and activation support is unavailable until further notice and CMDC will not be able to assist. All existing copies of MASS that have already been activated will continue to function normally. In the almost nine years of developing and supporting the MASS software, this is our first significant period of downtime and we sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

This post will be updated with any new information as it becomes available.

We appreciate your patience as we get our services back up and running. CMDC is making every effort to get things back up and running as quickly as possible. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call or email our office using the contact information at the bottom of this page.

 

]]>
What is the Difference Between “.masonry” and “.masonry14” Projects? https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/what-is-the-difference-between-masonry-and-masonry14-projects/ Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:59:35 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5663 With the release of MASS Version 3.0 comes a new design standard as well as a new type of project file.

What’s the difference? How can old projects be opened/converted? Which format should you be using? Continue reading for quick answers to all of your questions.

What is the difference?

While from a software perspective, they are nearly identical, there are some key differences between “.masonry” and “.masonry14” projects which can be summarized in the image below:

Project Types 1 summary image

The old “.masonry” projects are saved and used in Versions 2.2 and older, designing in accordance with the 2004 CSA standards.

New “.masonry14” projects are saved and used in Versions 3.0 and newer, designing in accordance with the 2014 CSA Standards.

That’s it! They are structurally the same file but with different Windows File Explorer associations, meaning if you double click either type of project, it will be opened with the corresponding version of MASS. The icon has also been slightly redesigned but more on that further below. A more important item of concern is MASS Version compatibility.

What about compatibility? Can old .masonry projects be opened using newer versions of MASS?

Yes! When opening an existing project, only the .masonry14 projects are shown by default. This can be changed by changing the file type displayed in the bottom right corner of the “Open” display window and changing the selection to “S304.1-04 MASS Project (*.masonry)

Project Types 2 change filetype displayed

Making this change will allow older, existing .masonry projects to be displayed and selected for opening. Once a project is selected, the following warning is displayed:

Project Types 3 compatibiltiy warning

Upon clicking yes, the existing file can be “Saved As” a .masonry14″ project with the same assemblage inputs. The project will then be opened and run using the new “.masonry14” file type.

Note: The same action can be performed when it comes to opening “.masonry14” projects with MASS Version 2.2. Simply change the selection from showing S304.1-04 projects to S304-14 Projects and then, when prompted, “Save As” a .masonry project to continue working on it.

How to tell the different file types apart

The easiest way to tell if a project is saved using the newer or older format is by the file extension. If these are not displayed, the file type can be found by right clicking on a project and selecting “Properties”. There are also slight differences in the icons so that different project types can be identified if several of each are contained in the same folder, pictured below.

Project Types 4 icon samples

Above are the old and new icons side by side. While it is not a huge difference, the change was meant to add a subtle cue to help differentiate old vs. new projects.

As always, feel free to contact us if you have any questions at all. CMDC is the authorized service provider for the MASS software which is a joint effort of between CCMPA and CMDC.

]]>
Masonry Beam Design: How to design beams with what might seem like less than the minimum reinforcement ratio https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/masonry-beam-design-how-to-design-beams-with-less-than-the-minimum-reinforcement/ Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:22:47 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5945 When a design seems like it might not meet minimum steel, all hope is not lost

While there is no way around satisfying the minimum steel requirements in the CSA S304, there is a clause that can be taken advantage of that is not used by MASS. By following the procedure outlined in this article, beams can be designed within the restraints of the CSA standards while also containing less than the minimum reinforcement area as prescribed by clause 11.2.3.1. This often overlooked clause can be very helpful when it comes to masonry beam design, especially those that would seem at face value to be the easiest to design due to nominal loads and short spans.

July 2020 Update: This clause has been incorporated into the release of MASS Version 4.0.

Disclaimer: This post is exclusively intended to provide insight into the approach taken by the MASS design software in interpreting a CSA S304-14 code compliant design. It is up to the professional discretion of the designer to input an appropriate layout, boundary and loading conditions, interpret the results, and determine how they should be incorporated into their designs. As per the end user license agreement (and also recommended within PEO’s guidelines for using engineering software), a tool cannot be considered competent and reliance on a tool does not relieve the user of responsibility.

To jump straight to a summary further down the post, click here.

The smallest beams with only nominal loading can also be the trickiest to design. One of the reasons is the need to satisfy minimum reinforcement ratio requirements in S304-14: 11.2.3:

Currently in the MASS software, all beam designs not meeting ρmin in clause 11.2.3.1 will fail moment and deflection design, shown below in the simplified moment results tab:

While these designs are failed before attempting an incrementally larger design with more reinforcement, there is an option at the engineer’s disposal outside of MASS: invoke the mighty power of clause 11.2.3.2 which often goes overlooked.

There was some initial due diligence behind including this clause in the MASS software. It was not included as programming costs would be very high. The change would involve functionally designing two beams; the first being the actual beam used for the design, and the second beam being the theoretical beam containing one third less reinforcement which would be used to resist the factored moment. While at first glance, it might seem acceptable to instead ensure that the beam has additional moment resistance by factor of 4/3. However, while it is very close, there is not quite a directly proportional relationship between a beam’s moment resistance and its longitudinal reinforcement area so this approach would not adequately reflect the phrasing of clause 11.2.3.2.

How to use this clause

There are two different approaches that can be taken to satisfy clause 11.2.3 and design a beam that contains less than the required reinforcement ratio, or ρmin,  of clause 11.2.3.1:

Method 1

Compare the area of reinforcement to the area required by analysis increased by one third

Method 2

Compare the factored load to the load resisted by the beam if the reinforcement area were reduced by a third

Unfortunately, there is no way around completing a separate analysis to determine “the area of reinforcement required by analysis” quoted directly from the standard. Since the minimum reinforcement is a function of loading, one cannot be solved without assuming the other. Method 1 is likely more intuitive as it returns an alternative minimum reinforcement area to clause 11.2.3.1. However, Method 2 can be more straight forward to calculate as there is no need solve a quadratic or cubic function.

Method 1: Comparing areas of reinforcement

The approach taken in method 1 is to answer the question: “How much reinforcement is required in this beam design?”. This can be expanded to “What area of steel results in factored moment being equal to moment resistance?”. For beams with compression steel or intermediate steel which may not necessarily be yielding, it is likely easiest to solve for this value using a spreadsheet and GoalSeek or Solver since a simplified expression would likely require finding the roots of a cubic function and would also rely upon an assumed strain profile if the steel is yielding. Minimum reinforcement failure messages do not tend to present themselves for beams with several layers of steel so this article will focus on the simple beam designs where these issues arise.

The area of steel required, or Asreq, can be solved for using force and moment equilibrium for any beam configuration where the beam’s moment resistance is equal to the maximum factored moment (Mr = Mf). The expression below can be used calculate this minimum area of reinforcement for beams with only tension reinforcement:

Note that this expression is only applicable to beams that exclusively contain primary tension steel to resist flexure (ie. no intermediate or compression steel). This formula also assumes that the tension steel is yielding which is a requirement in clause 11.2.2. Also, while the area of reinforcement required is typically a function of a beam’s moment resistance, it is possible that other factors such as cracking and deflection may govern the design and as such, should never be assumed to be satisfied and always checked manually (in addition to using this formula).

The units of each input are shown below as well as the derivation which can be expanded.

Units - click to expand

Asmin, Asreq are both areas in mm2

Φs, Φmχ are unitless

fs, f’m are strengths in MPa (or N/mm2)

d, b are both lengths in mm

Mr is the moment resistance (set equal to factored moment) in kN*m

Note: Mr is multiplied by 106 to convert the value from kN*m to N*mm

Expression derivation - click to expand

Starting with force equilibrium of a simple beam in bending, an expression for c can be rearranged based on all other inputs.

This expression can be substituted into a moment equilibrium equation which can be rearranged into ax2 + bx + c = 0 format.

Now, recall (from grade 10 math) how to solve for the roots of a quadratic. In this case, it is the positive root which gives the simplified expression for Asreq that we can use (The other root is not a valid solution since it is orders of magnitudes larger, violating strain profile assumptions which are used to generate the expression).

Quick note regarding the other root: The positive root in the original quadratic solution end up with the expression above with a negative sign in front of the square root term once substitutions have been made and then simplified. Had the expression been arranged on the left side of the equal sign rather than the right (as was done above) then we would be using the negative root, with a positive sign in front of the square root term with all other terms having flipped to negative.

The simplified expression no longer contains the plus/minus symbol to omit the other root that is not relevant in checking minimum steel. This is because it results in a required area of steel which is order of magnitudes larger than the value we are interested and the internal cross section forces as well as the strain profile used to derive this expression are no longer valid when the area of steel is so large. For example, in the scenario in the collapsible section below, a 2 course beam requires either an area of steel at the balanced condition of 8.64mm2 or 105,633mm2. If we were to entertain the second solution as possibly being valid, this would result in a tension force coupling with almost 36,000,000kN from the masonry. This would require a beam with a compression depth of more than 70m so hopefully by now it is clear how far outside the scope of our original beam we have wandered. With that new ridiculous new neutral axis location, the steel is no longer in the tension side of the beam which is one of the areas where things fall apart. From a pure mathematical perspective, it does satisfy the equation but the conditions behind that expression are no longer valid at such large values of As,req.

Method 1 Example (with MASS input)

Consider 1.2m long opening within a concrete block elevation that is being spanned by a masonry beam which rests upon 200mm supports on either side. Note that the bearing length has been shortened from the default 300mm further explained here.

Assuming that the condition for arching are present (see Section 5.6. Load Distribution on lintel Beams in our textbook for more), the loading can be modeled as two triangularly distributed loads plus the self-weight of the beam itself. In this case, the maximum magnitude of the masonry supported by arching (assuming hollow masonry in the three courses above the grouted beam) is 1.672 kN/m, or 800mm (length of beam divided by 2) multiplied by 2.19kN/m2 (the weight per square metre of wall which can be found on page 751, here, for all unit sizes and types)

If using a 20cm, 15MPa unit, this beam will initially fail moment design, citing the following failure message:

Keep in mind that when a design in MASS fails, the displayed error corresponds to the most recently attempted design. In this case, the error message is based on a beam with several No. 25 longitudinal bars placed in tension. Earlier sections that would have been attempted could have failed for a number of reasons and in this case where the loading is nominal, sections not containing the minimum steel ratio in clause 11.2.3.1 result in the error message displayed at the top of this post. It can be triggered in MASS by deselecting all reinforcement options other than one No. 10 bar placed at the bottom of the beam.

The actual reinforcement ratio of this “failing design” can be found by clicking on the Detailed Moment Results tab and scrolling down to the bottom:

While it fails according to MASS, designs such as these are prime candidates for invoking the mighty power of clause 11.2.3.2.

This beam with a single No. 10 bar (100mm2) has more than eleven times the area of reinforcement required by analysis (8.64mm2) and easily exceeds requirement of having an additional one-third. Compared to the limit from clause 11.2.3.1, which would require 117.6mm2 (0.002ρ = 0.002*190mm*309.35mm), this is the S304’s way of taking light loading into account for these types of designs.

To further illustrate this relationship, As,min plotted as a function of Mf is shown below:

Since the area of a No. 10 bar is less than the area required by 11.2.3.1, it is necessary to use clause 11.2.3.2 to satisfy minimum steel. The relationship between Asmin and Mf is very close to linear (R2 = 0.997) so for each 1kN*m increase in factored moment, roughly 11.3mm2 of steel is required (Note that this relationship is specific to a particular beam configuration and cannot be applied to others).

Method 2: Comparing Loads

Rather than ask the question, “What is the minimum area of reinforcement needed?” for a beam design, the other way to approach satisfying clause 11.2.3.2 is to assume that the area of steel present is equal to the minimum allowable and determine the largest possible factored moment that the assumption is valid for. Since this clause takes loading into account to evaluate minimum steel, rather than use a load to check the area of steel, method 2 involves using an area of steel to check the load. As mentioned earlier, this method may appear less intuitive as it is not as simple as comparing the reinforcement present to another minimum value. However, the steps used to determine the maximum allowable are the same as those used to calculate the moment resistance of any other beam design which is why method 2 may be preferable.

The table below shows a summary of the maximum allowable factored moments resisted by beams which contain less reinforcement than allowable by clause 11.2.3.1 for four possible beam geometries:

Maximum applied factored moment for a beams having less than the required reinforcement ratio in accordance with S304-14: 11.2.3.1 to satisfy S304-14: 11.2.3.2

Disclaimer: These values should not be relied upon as part of the design process. They are meant to illustrate the concept that very low areas of reinforcement may be acceptable, depending on the applied loads. The full cross section should be analyzed by the engineer by hand (or other tool) to check these requirements in a way that is applicable to the situation.

As stated under the simplified method 1 expression earlier, although the area of steel  required is typically governed by moment resistance, it is possible that other factors such as cracking and deflection may govern the design and as such, should never be assumed to be satisfied and always checked manually. 

Table assumptions and background information

This table is only meant to be a guide to assist the engineer in designing a beam that does not satisfy minimum steel requirements in MASS which only checks against clause 11.2.3.1. An example outlining the exact process can be found further below by clicking on the expandable heading: “Method 2 Example“.

Masonry unit properties such as length, height thickness, and face shell thickness were set to the default values used by MASS according to the default masonry unit database. These values can be found on p751 to p753 of our textbook. Reinforcement placement was also assumed to be the same as the default bar placement used in MASS for each unit and reinforcing bar size which is based on a 75mm vertical clearance from the bottom face of the beam to the closest face of the bar. A yield strain of 0.002 was used for all bars with an elastic modulus of 200,000 MPa.

Obviously there are other properties such as masonry unit size and strength which will also affect these values and can be found by expanding the detailed table below. The table was simplified relatively late in this investigation exercise after observing how little variance there was in maximum factored moment as a function of unit size and strength. Factored moment was selected as the limiting variable for this table so that it would be independent of a beam’s span or load magnitude (a large span would be limited to a considerably smaller uniformly distributed load compared to that of a smaller span).

Expanded table taking unit size and strength into account

Maximum applied factored moment for a beams having less than the required reinforcement ratio in accordance with S304-14: 11.2.3.1 to satisfy S304-14: 11.2.3.2

Disclaimer: These values should not be relied upon as part of the design process. They are meant to illustrate the concept that very low areas of reinforcement may be acceptable, depending on the applied loads. The full cross section should be analyzed by the engineer by hand (or other tool) to check these requirements in a way that is applicable to the situation.

Within each beam arrangement (ie. “2 Course Beam” with a “No. 15 Bar”), there is a smaller table where the column headings refer to masonry unit sizes (10cm, 15cm, 20cm, etc.) and the row headings refer to masonry unit strength (15MPa, 20MPa, etc.). As mentioned earlier, the variance within each beam arrangement was found to be relatively low.

All “N/A” values refer to configurations which satisfy clause 11.2.3.1 and will currently pass using MASS, independent of loading. Designs that did not result in strain profiles with yielding reinforcement were also checked against and removed as they are not allowable in accordance with S304-14: 11.2.2. There were not found to be any configurations that did not yield that also did not contain the reinforcement ratio required by clause 11.2.3.1. This was expected as yielding errors are a result of a beam containing too much reinforcement, increasing the coupled compression zone and lowering the location of the neutral axis while reducing the strain of reinforcement in tension.

Note that for designs using 2 No. 10 bars in tension (same bar area as 1 No. 15 bar), the placement is affected as the distance from the compression face of the beam is slightly further away from the vertical centroid of the bars. This change increases the moment arm separating the coupled internal forces and slightly increases the maximum allowable moment for these designs. The lower (and more conservative) values are shown in the table for simplicity however the comparison can be expanded below.

Maximum factored moment using 2 No. 10's compared to 1 No. 15 bar

Maximum factored moment for a 3 course beam with 1 No. 15 Bar (d = 507mm):

Disclaimer: These values should not be relied upon as part of the design process. They are meant to illustrate the concept that very low areas of reinforcement may be acceptable, depending on the applied loads. The full cross section should be analyzed by the engineer by hand (or other tool) to check these requirements in a way that is applicable to the situation.

Maximum factored moment for a 3 course beam with 2 No. 10 Bars (d = 509.35mm):

Disclaimer: These values should not be relied upon as part of the design process. They are meant to illustrate the concept that very low areas of reinforcement may be acceptable, depending on the applied loads. The full cross section should be analyzed by the engineer by hand (or other tool) to check these requirements in a way that is applicable to the situation.

Method 2 Example

Having already established that 7mm2 of longitudinal steel is sufficient in satisfying 11.2.3, what is the largest moment that can be applied to a beam containing one No. 10 bar?

Since the requirements of 11.2.3.2 are a function of loading where minimum reinforcement area increases with loading, the highest load can be found by assuming that exactly the minimum cross sectional area is present within the beam. If a No. 10 bar has an area of 100mm2 which is also equal to the minimum, the moment resistance will be based on a beam with 3/4 the steel, or 75mm2.

Note: 3/4 was used rather than 2/3 due to the interpretation of “at least one third greater” from clause 11.2.3.2 being represented as “1 + 1/3” or “4/3” of the area required. The inverse, or 3/4, can be used to use this clause to check the design with a known area of reinforcement.

Continuing with the beam in the earlier example (20cm, 15mPa unit reinforced using a No. 10 bar, loaded up to 0.9 kN*m), the location of the neutral axis can be determined, followed by the moment resistance:

The moment resistance solved for here represents the maximum allowable load for the provisions of clause 11.2.3.2.to be valid. Therefore, the beam satisfies the CSA S304-14:11.2.3 minimum reinforcement requirements as long as the factored moment does not exceed 7.25kN*m (specific to the example beam constructed with 20cm, 15MPa units reinforced using a single No. 10 bar). Since the example beam was loaded to only 0.9kN*m, minimum steel requirements are satisfied.

The same procedure was followed for all of the other entries in the expanded table where unit size and strength are considered. For example, a 2 course beam constructed using 30cm, 25mPa units reinforced with a No. 15 bar can be loaded up to a bending moment or 24.79kN*m. (Note: The simplified table lists 23.83kN*m which is based the most conservative configuration which in this case is a 25cm, 15MPa unit)

Final Summary

All hope is not lost when a beam design fails due to not satisfying minimum steel using MASS, which only checks against CSA S304-14: 11.2.3.1. It is possible to satisfy minimum reinforcement requirements by instead using clause 11.2.3.2 by approaching the design in one of two ways:

  • Method 1: checking bar area against one third greater than the area resulting in Mf being equal to Mr
    • This can be done quickly for beams with only primary tension reinforcement using the following expression:

  • Method 2: checking factored moment against moment resistance for a beam with a third less steel than what is actually present within the beam.
    • This can be quickly checked by comparing the factored moment to the maximum allowable moment in the table below:

Disclaimer: These values should not be relied upon as part of the design process. They are meant to illustrate the concept that very low areas of reinforcement may be acceptable, depending on the applied loads. The full cross section should be analyzed by the engineer by hand (or other tool) to check these requirements in a way that is applicable to the situation. Regardless of which method is used, it is up to the designer to ensure that in addition to satisfying the minimum reinforcement requirements in S304-14:11.3.2, all other provisions must be considered and independently verified. The guides in both methods are based on the area of reinforcement being governed by applied bending moment at any section within the beam which is not true for all cases.

As always, feel free to contact us if you have any questions at all. CMDC is the authorized service provider for the MASS software which is a joint effort of between CCMPA and CMDC.

]]>
Offline Activation: How to start using MASS without an internet connection https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/offline-activation-how-to-start-using-mass-without-an-internet-connection/ Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:13:47 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5625 If you have a purchased or renewed license but don’t have access to internet, offline activation is what you will need to start designing with MASS.

As mentioned in our Activation Guide, the easiest way to activate MASS is online. If you have internet but the online activation is still not working, you can quickly solve this by following our online activation troubleshooting guide.

Offline activation starts the same way as online, simply enter your serial number and make sure that it appears in green text.

offline activation 1 select offline

The “Computer ID” will appear once you select the “Offline activation” option. This is generated by MASS and is what differentiates computers based on hardware and software information. In Versions of MASS older than 2.2, it would change for users who upgraded their operation system but were still using the same computer. Versions 2.2 and newer have been changed so that fewer people would have to explain to us that they are using the same machine, despite MASS thinking the user was trying to use their license on a new computer. As per the end user license agreement (EULA), each MASS serial number can be activated on only one machine.

Step 1: Send MASS Support the required information

Once MASS has generated your Computer ID, you will need to contact MASS Support and provide all of:

  1. Your name (ie. Brad Crumb)
  2. Email address (ie. bcrumb@canadamasonrycentre.com)
  3. Serial number (ie.BHHI0C0I00A1F1GC8F822M1JGWZSJ6C)
  4. Computer ID (ie.5552YMSM/0A+)

offline activation 2 copy computer ID

Remember, Copy and Paste is your friend!

If possible, copying and pasting before sending is the best way to transfer the serial number and computer ID to reduce the odds of a typo during transfer. If any character is missing or slightly off, the activation code will not work. You can copy the Computer ID by selecting it and right clicking. It can be impossible to tell an O from a 0, or a l from an I or a 1!

[clear]

 

Step 2: Receive Activation Code and Activate

Once you have sent all the required information, you will be given the “Activation Code” which you can enter below the computer ID to complete the activation process. If you look next to “License status”, you will know that MASS has been successfully activated if you see “MASS will expire ____” with a future date listed.

offline activation 3 successful activation

As always, feel free to contact us if you have any questions at all. CMDC is the authorized service provider for the MASS software which is a joint effort of between CCMPA and CMDC.

]]>
Help! Online Activation is not working https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/help-online-activation-is-not-working/ Wed, 31 Aug 2016 19:53:47 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5578 While it should be simple and straightforward, for some reason, MASS just refuses to activate. Follow these steps to get your license activated today.

If you can read this article but MASS thinks you don’t have internet, there are two things you can do to get around this issue. While either one should work on their own, we’ve outlined 2 just in case.

October 2016 Update: Windows 10 users must jump straight to option 2. Since the initial publishing of this article, there have been many cases of users not having success after attempting option 1

First of all, this article is for those who have tried to activate online and gotten an error message about not having an internet connection. More general activation questions are answered here on our quick activation guide. If you can’t get an internet connection through other programs other than MASS, you may need to activate offline.

This page will help you if you have seen either of the 2 following error messages

online activation 7 error message combined

MASS not being able to connect to the internet is a result of your computer trying to protect you from malicious software infecting your computer. We should say that there is absolutely nothing malicious within MASS that you need to be worried about. By default, Windows is suspicious of programs contacting servers outside of your own office which is why you need to take an extra step in allowing that connection. Option 1, outlined below, is the easiest and fastest way to restore that connection.

Note: You only have to follow this procedure once to activate. you will not have to do this each time you wish to use MASS

Option 1: Run MASS as an Administrator

online activation 4 start menu admin

Even if you are using your own personal computer where you have full access to all files and operations, you still need to manually do this for Windows to allow MASS to have internet access. To do this, simply find MASS in your Start menu, right click, and select Run as Administrator

This will launch MASS with full administrator rights which will allow it to reach our server to activate. You will not see anything different when MASS opens however, you will be able to activate online. Click here to return to the general activation guide for an online activation walk-through.

[clear]

Can't find this option? Click here for other ways to launch MASS as an administrator

The appearance will look different if you are not using Windows 10 however the instructions remain the same; find MASS in your Start menu, right click, and select Run as Administrator. If the option is not readily available, you can go to the location where MASS is installed and find the option there.

By default, this will be C:\Program Files (x86)\Masonry Analysis Structural Systems Version __where the version number of the folder matches the version you have installed.

online activation 5 MASS program directory

You can then right click the MASS.exe file and select Run as administrator.

online activation 6 right click

You can also access the “Run as administrator” option by right clicking on any application, selecting “Properties“, and under the compatibility tab selecting the “Run as administrator” option and clicking OK.

Option 2: Add a Windows Firewall exception

This option will target the root of the problem rather which is that the reason MASS is unable to connect to the internet is because Windows Firewall is blocking the application. Individual programs can be allowed through in the Control Panel which will be explained below. Note that administrator privileges are required so if you could not follow option 1 because of a lack of user permissions, you will not be able to follow option 2 either.

Click on the tabs from left to right to go through the steps required to add the exception.
[tabgroup]
Start by opening the Control Panel. The easiest way to do this is by opening the Start menu and typing in the search bar.

online activation 8 Control Panel

In the search bar in the top right corner, type “firewall” and before pressing enter, you will be presented with a variety of options. Select “Allow an app through Windows Firewall”.

online activation 9 Control Panel Search

Click the next tab (Allow another App) above to proceed to the next step

online activation 16 allow transition

When you open the Windows Firewall settings, you will first need to select “Change settings” in order to enable the greyed-out options below.

online activation 10 firewall admin

Once you have enabled the Firewall options, click “Allow another app…” to select MASS.

online activation 11 Allow another app

Click the next tab (Locate MASS) to proceed to the next step

online activation 17 locate transition

Click Browse near the bottom right and navigate to the directory where MASS is installed. Select “MASS.exe” and press Enter to add the exception.

online activation 12 firewall browse for MASSonline activation 13 browse for MASS

Then click “add” to finalize this selection online activation 14 firewall add exception

Click the next tab (Enable Firewall Exception) above to proceed to the next step

online activation 18 Enable transition

Find “Masonry Analysis Structural Systems” in the list of applications and select all 3 options. Once they are selected, click OK at the bottom of the window to enable the exception.

online activation 15 check other permissions

Click the next tab (Relaunch MASS and Activate) above to proceed to the next step.

online activation 19 Relaunch transition

Now that the Firewall exception has been enabled, launch MASS and activate as normal to access the software. Simply enter your serial number and click “Activate

Activation article 1 online activation

Fill out the form and click submit to complete this process.

Activation article 2 online form filled

You will know MASS has been activated when, next to “License status”, it reads “MASS will expire _______” with the date being sometime down the road. You are good to go, can close the activation window, and start designing again!

[/tabgroup]

 

As always, feel free to contact us if you have any questions at all. CMDC is the authorized service provider for the MASS software which is a joint effort of between CCMPA and CMDC.

]]>
The Definitive Activation Guide for MASS https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/the-definitive-activation-guide-for-mass/ Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:24:45 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5564 Whether you are activating for the first time or renewing your license, this guide will help you gain access to the full MASS software

In order to be able to activate MASS, you need to know your serial number which starts with the letter B and is 31 characters long.

The example used here will be: BHHI0C0I00A1F1GC8F822M1JGWZSJ6C

You can find it on your MASS website dashboard (link will open in a new tab). Don’t have a serial number? You can purchase yours on the MASS website store by clicking here.

If you have an internet connection, the easiest way to activate is Online

If you’ve already tried to activate online and it didn’t work, click here. If you don’t have any internet connection at all, click here.

For an online activation, all you need to do is enter your serial number and click Activate.

Activation article 1 online activation

Serial number text red instead of green? Click here

Whether your serial number text is showing up in red or green depends only on the length of the code you have entered. We added this feature to help quickly identify copying errors.

Activation article 5 red serial number

Once you have clicked Activate, a form will open requesting your information. Enter this all in and then click Submit.

Activation article 2 online form filled

You’ll know it worked if you see the following before the Serial Number Registration window is closed

Activation article 3 successful online form filled

If you are getting a message saying that you don’t have an internet connection but you can still receive emails and view web pages, you aren’t alone! Click here to quickly get around this error.

When you are taken back to the main Registration Key Code window, you’ll notice that next to License status, it will list an expiry date. At this point, you are activated and can close the window. The welcome screen will show your updated activation status the next time you launch MASS as well.

Activation article 4 successful activation

Activation article 6 welcome screen activated

No internet? No Problem!

We’ve always had the option of activating offline because not every computer has internet and even for the ones that do, there can be problems that come along. Click here to jump to the Offline Activation guide. Please be advised that this involves contacting MASS technical support so activation may not be possible outside of regular business hours.

Still looking for answers?

Please do not hesitate to call or email CMDC for all technical and non-technical software inquiries. Among all of the many cervices provided by CMDC, timely and effective technical support is always just an email or phone call away!

]]>
What to do about MASS software crashes https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/what-to-do-about-mass-software-crashes/ Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:13:46 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5513 Before you light your computer on fire, try these fixes to get you back up and running

While the majority of our users are using MASS trouble-free, we get calls and emails from time to time about crashes that usually have a simple fix. These steps will get you back up and running as quickly as possible.

1. Uninstall MASS (including old versions you may still have) then reinstall

You can view installed programs and select MASS to uninstall through the Control Panel. Once you have MASS uninstalled, you can then reinstall the newest version which will hopefully solve your issue. Note that uninstalling and reinstalling MASS will not affect your activation so you do not need to worry about having to reactivate.

Click here for instructions on how to get a new MASS installer

If you have your serial number and know the email address of the account used to purchase your license, you can visit our upgrades page to download the newest version available. Note that at the time of posting this article, MASS Version 2.2 was the newest version available. The Upgrades page is kept up to date as new versions are released.

Crash article 5 download upgrade

If you are logged in to the MASS website, view your user dashboard and select the “DOWNLOAD SOFTWARE option on the right.

Crash article 4 download program

You can then run this file to install MASS on your computer

2. Try running MASS as an administrator or with administrator rights.

While this might not be an option for someone working within a large company who may have to go through their IT department, users using MASS on their own computers can run MASS as an administrator to see if that solves their issue. If the problem is solved then you know that user permissions were causing the problem.

Click here for instructions on running programs with administrator rights

The easiest way to run MASS as an administrator is to fine MASS in your windows start menu and right click on the application, selecting the “Run as administrator” option.You can quickly find MASS by searching in the search bar found at the bottom of the start menu.

Crash article 6 run as administrator start menu

The screenshot above was taken using Windows 10 but the same can be done using Windows 7 and 8.

You can also navigate to MASS in your file explorer by opening “My computer” (Windows 7 and 8) or “This PC” (Windows 10) and going to C:\Program Files (x86)\Masonry Analysis Structural Systems. Right click on MASS.exe and select the “Run as administrator” option.

Crash article 7 run as administrator file explorer

3. Contact MASS Support

Unlike many companies who will try and divert you to their self-directed online support, we actually encourage everyone to just call or email when something comes up. We don’t want you wasting time when someone can get you on your way in no time at all!

Click here to visit the CMDC contact page (CMDC is the authorized support provider of the MASS software)

Click here to visit the MASS website contact support page

There are different types of crashes that can happen when using MASS. An important detail to note or pass along to myself or Luisa is what you were doing immediately before MASS crashed on you. Were you just opening the software for the first time? Were you trying to print? Did you open your 101st shear wall in the same project file? These details are very helpful in getting you back up and running as quickly as possible.

Bonus: Specific MASS crash you might be dealing with

Does this look familiar? It appears when first clicking to launch the MASS software.

Crash article 1

Click here for full error message in text format

System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Index and length must refer to a location within the string.

Parameter name: length

at System.String.Substring(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length)

at Masonry.UserInterface.DashBoardScreen.,ctor(MainFrame mainFrameParent)

as Masonry.UserInterface.App.Main(String[] args)

We added this to help people who might be Googling this specific problem. You’re welcome :)

This is an error that some users experienced after using MASS Version 2.2 having to do with the “Recent Projects” pane added to the left hand side of the welcome screen. What is happening here is MASS is trying (unsuccessfully) to load up the list of most recently worked on projects. The fix is fairly simple: Go to the location of the Recent Projects file and delete it, resetting the reference and solving the crash. The one downside of this fix is that your list of projects will be cleared, as if you were running MASS for the first time.

To find the file, go to your user folder (bcrumb in my screenshot below) and open the MASS folder where you can find and delete Recent.txt.

Crash article 8 Recent Projects

Once that folder is deleted, you should be good to go!

For all other inquiries, please to not hesitate to contact us!

]]>
Why your MASS installer is opening as a text file https://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/software/why-your-mass-installer-is-opening-as-a-text-file/ Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:18:21 +0000 http://www.canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/?p=5391 If you are reading this then chances are you have downloaded a new version of MASS and have encountered a strange quirk in Firefox. Does this look familiar? Then read on to see what the problem is.

Hundred of thousands of lines of giberish doesn't help when you need to design with masonry!

The issue here is that for some reason, Firefox really enjoys adding “.txt” to the end of your installer file, replacing the original “.msi” file extension.

There are 2 ways to fix this

   1. Remove the “.txt” from the filename in windows explorer

Simply remove the “.txt” by right clicking, selecting “rename” and then press enter to save your changes. To start, go to the folder where MASS was downloaded.

software text post 2

Right click and select “rename”

software text post 3

Remove the “.txt” that appears at the end

software text post 4

File extensions not appearing for you? Go here to find out how to display them.

You will be asked about changing the file extension. Click “Yes” to continue.

software text post 5

Once you’ve changed the file type, you should notice that the icon will have changed. You can now double click to run the MASS installer.

software text post 6

 

   2. Download MASS using a different Web browser

You can get Chrome here. There are lots of other browsers out there so you can take your pick. Give Internet Explorer a try if you have it installed as it comes by default on most computers.

edit: some users still have this issue with chrome. You may have to go with option 1 where you delete the .txt file extension.

So why is this even an issue?

I can’t say for sure but if I had to guess, I would say that it is their way of adding another layer of security to keep you from accidentally downloading a virus or some other form of malware onto your machine. After all, you might know that National Masonry Design Programs is a trustworthy software provider (It definitely is!) but Firefox lacks the same outstanding judgement and intelligence so it adds the “.txt” to help keep you safe.

edit: It has come to my attention that some users are having the same issue with Chrome so you may need to get rid of that .txt regardless.

software text post end

Credit: http://shoze.blogspot.ca/2011/06/brorwser-wars.html

]]>